Minot, North Dakota: A Decade of Resilience, Reinvention, and Grant-Driven Transformation

By Steven J. Borjeson

Introduction 

In the summer of 2011, Minot, North Dakota faced one of the most devastating natural  disasters in its history. The Souris River, swollen by record rainfall and upstream  snowmelt, overtopped levees and inundated nearly a quarter of the city, forcing more than  12,000 residents from their homes. The April/May 2015 issue of The Western Planner  Minot, North Dakota: Small City, Checkered Past, Bright Future captured the city’s early  recovery, including neighborhood rehabilitation, housing shortages, and rapid population  growth tied to the Bakken oil boom. 

More than a decade later, Minot’s story has shifted from emergency response to long-term  transformation. Recovery has been driven by the resolve of residents and reinforced by  major federal and state grants, local investment, and sustained planning efforts. What  began as a community in crisis has evolved into a regional model for flood resilience,  economic diversification, and comprehensive planning leadership. 

The Flood That Changed Everything 

On June 22, 2011, the Souris River surged past every recorded benchmark, reaching  levels unseen since 18811. Record snowpack in Saskatchewan and persistent spring  rainfall produced a hydrologic event that overwhelmed Minot’s flood protection system2.  Levees were overtopped, temporary dikes failed, and pump stations exceeded their  capacity as floodwaters rapidly inundated neighborhoods long considered safe3. 

More than 4,100 homes were damaged or destroyed, infrastructure across the city failed,  and public facilities including parks, schools, and fire stations suffered extensive  damage4/5. Over 12,000 residents evacuated in the largest displacement event in North  Dakota history3. Despite coordinated efforts by local responders, the National Guard, and  mutual-aid partners, the city experienced widespread disruption, long-term displacement,  and severe economic impacts. 

As the water receded, deeper systemic vulnerabilities became clear. The flood exposed  aging infrastructure, long-standing gaps in emergency preparedness, and weaknesses in  decades-old floodplain policies4/5. It also highlighted the challenges of managing a  binational watershed governed by U.S. and Canadian authorities2. These lessons ultimately reshaped local planning, zoning, housing strategy, and capital investments6,  making the 2011 flood a pivotal turning point in Minot’s civic identity.

Immediate Response and Community Heroism 

In the days surrounding the flood’s crest, Minot demonstrated extraordinary unity and  resolve. Residents converged on makeshift sandbag stations, forming human chains that  stretched across neighborhoods as volunteers worked alongside airmen, business  owners, retirees, and students5. When emergency loudspeakers warned that dikes were  failing, neighbors mobilized instantly, helping families evacuate valuables and reach  higher ground 7 . Volunteer networks shifted block by block as conditions changed,  reinforcing the sense that “the whole city showed up at once.” 

Evacuations were difficult and often perilous. Guard members waded through knee-deep  water to assist elderly residents, while volunteers carried pets and personal items to  comfort displaced children7/8. Emergency responders worked around the clock with FEMA  and state agencies to maintain evacuation routes, manage shelters, and deliver supplies5

Local churches organized meal trains, businesses donated food, and medical volunteers  established mobile clinics to treat injuries and stress-related conditions4. At Minot Air Force  Base, airmen took leave to reinforce dikes and assist with temporary housing efforts. Even  after the river receded, families with dry homes housed neighbors, and volunteers spent  weeks clearing debris and salvaging belongings. These acts of compassion became a  defining memory of the disaster, illustrating a deep culture of shared responsibility and  community resilience7. 

Long-Term Recovery: The Central Role of Grants 

Minot Ten Years Later – Key Takeaways 

• Over $176 million in CDBG-DR and CDBG-NDR funding transformed Minot’s housing,  infrastructure, and flood resilience. 

• The Souris River Flood Protection Project now directs long-term land-use decisions  and protects thousands of homes and businesses. 

• Downtown Minot has undergone substantial revitalization through NDR funds, the  Renaissance Zone, local grants, and MAGIC Fund investments. 

• State development funds ($2.65 million plus a $200,000 loan in 2025) helped expand  local businesses and childcare capacity. 

• Local philanthropy supplied more than $600,000 in 2025 alone for community  programs, facilities, and nonprofit operations. 

• The city has strengthened its planning, grant-management, and emergency preparedness capacity. 

• Minot’s economy is diversifying beyond oil through manufacturing, logistics, childcare  infrastructure, and small-business investment. 

• Climate adaptation—once a side consideration—is now central to Minot’s long-term  strategy.

Minot’s recovery was anchored by disciplined use of federal, state, and local funding.  CDBG-DR allocations provided 67.6 million dollars for housing reconstruction and  infrastructure repair, while the city’s successful application for HUD’s National Disaster  Resilience competition added another 74.3 million dollars positioning Minot as a national  leader in resilience planning6/9. In total, more than 176 million dollars in CDBG programs  enabled large-scale reinvestment10

State investments reinforced these gains. The North Dakota Development Fund supported  business expansion and childcare capacity, including major awards to Scranton Holding  Co. and Oswill Properties LLC 11 . Philanthropic support, especially the Minot Area  Community Foundation’s more than 600,000 dollars in 2025 grants, strengthened  nonprofits, parks, and community services12.

Local tools, including the MAGIC Fund, played a key role by investing more than 33 million  dollars in redevelopment, business growth, and job creation13. Collectively, these funding  sources not only rebuilt the city but modernized infrastructure, diversified the economy,  and enhanced the city’s administrative capacity helping Minot transition from recovery to  long-term resilience10

Personal Stories: From Loss to Renewal 

Recovery in Minot is best understood through the experiences of residents. Entire  neighborhoods along the Souris River and in Eastwood Park were inundated, forcing  families from homes that had stood for generations5. Federal and local housing programs  helped many rebuild on the same lots often elevating structures to new standards while  others relocated to new, higher-ground neighborhoods supported by the HUD resilience  grant9/10. These new communities, including Park South and Milton Young, offered strong  utility networks, better street connections, and improved access to schools and parks. 

Small businesses also charted paths from devastation to renewal. Shops along Central  Avenue and in the downtown core used MAGIC Fund assistance and local redevelopment  support to reopen, modernize, and expand13. Revitalized storefronts, renovated interiors,  and increased foot traffic have helped transform downtown into a vibrant cultural and  commercial hub14

Public facilities reinforced the city’s social fabric. The Minot Public Library reopened with  improved technology, updated spaces, and expanded programming, supported by city  resources and philanthropic partners15. For many residents, its reopening symbolized the  return of normalcy and community life. These stories show individual acts of reconstruction  and renewal collectively illustrate Minot’s determination to rebuild not just structures, but  the sense of community woven through daily life7

A Decade Later: Minot’s New Path Forward 

Today, Minot’s planning framework reflects a shift from short-term recovery to long-term  transformation. More than 176 million dollars in resilience and disaster funding, paired with  state development awards and philanthropic support, have enabled the city to integrate  flood protection, housing, and economic strategy into a unified, forward-looking vision10

Flood-prone areas have gradually transitioned into greenways, stormwater basins, and  recreation corridors linked to regional trails providing risk reduction and new public  amenities6. New residential developments on higher ground offer improved utilities,  walkable street networks, and stronger access to services. Public facilities including parks, libraries, fire stations, and public works buildings have been upgraded not just to pre-flood  conditions but to serve as resilient, energy-efficient community anchors. 

Downtown revitalization has accelerated. Strategic use of CDBG resources, MAGIC Fund  support, and private investment has brought upper floors back into use, improved  streetscapes, and strengthened a diverse mix of restaurants, shops, and arts venues13/14.  The core now functions as a civic gathering space and economic engine. 

Institutionally, Minot has gained significant capacity. Staff expertise in grant administration, planning, hazard mitigation, and public engagement has expanded dramatically,  positioning the city to compete for major federal programs in transportation, climate  resilience, and economic development10. This capacity, perhaps the city’s most enduring  legacy, ensures that Minot can execute complex projects across multiple sectors for decades to come. 

1. A Modernized Physical Landscape 

The Souris River Flood Protection Project (SRFPP) remains the centerpiece of Minot’s  physical transformation. This multi-decade system includes levees, floodwalls, pump  stations, interior drainage improvements, and significant utility relocations16. Completed  phases such as the Fourth Avenue floodwall and the Napa Valley levee have already  reshaped the riverfront17. Future segments, including the Burlington-to-Minot corridor and  Maple Diversion expansion, will complete a protective system designed for future  hydrologic conditions18. 

Beyond engineered protections, CDBG-funded property buyouts have converted former  flood-damaged neighborhoods into open space, stormwater basins, and connected  parkland10. New resilience-funded housing developments offer safer, well-planned  neighborhoods with improved utilities and access to services6/9. The SRFPP now shapes  zoning, land-use decisions, and long-range planning, serving as the backbone of Minot’s  urban framework. 

2. A Reenergized Downtown Core 

Downtown Minot has experienced one of the most visible transformations of the past  decade, emerging as a vibrant cultural and commercial center that reflects the city’s broader shift from recovery to reinvention. Before the flood, the district faced long term  decline marked by vacant upper floors, aging infrastructure, and the steady movement of  businesses toward highway corridors. Post flood investment guided by the downtown  redevelopment plan and supported through MAGIC Fund resources, CDBG programs,  and private capital reversed this trend and set the stage for sustained revitalization13

Restoration of historic storefronts, upgrades to sidewalks and lighting, and the  redevelopment of long underused buildings have brought new restaurants, retail spaces,  and arts venues back into the core. Several small businesses that considered leaving  Minot instead reinvested with assistance from local gap financing and facade improvement  programs14. These efforts not only stabilized commercial activity but also strengthened the  district’s long term economic resilience. 

Today, downtown functions as a true civic gathering place, hosting festivals, markets,  public art, and a steadily expanding residential community. Its renewed vitality has become a defining element of Minot’s identity, demonstrating how coordinated planning  and targeted investment can create a stronger and more connected urban center for the  future 13/14

3. A Diversifying Regional Economy 

Economic diversification has become central to Minot’s stability. Manufacturing  expansions, logistics growth through the Port of North Dakota, childcare investments, and  new service-sector employers have shifted Minot away from reliance on oil-driven cycles  14/19. State awards, including major Development Fund investments, have strengthened  key industries and expanded childcare capacity supporting workforce participation and  employer recruitment11. 

Local tools such as the MAGIC Fund have supported more than 200 projects and helped  accelerate entrepreneurship, business expansions, and small-scale manufacturing13.  Healthcare, education, technology, and trades have also grown, supported by workforce  partnerships with Minot State University20. By pairing strategic investment with targeted  incentives, Minot has built a more balanced and resilient economic base. 

4. Improved Governance and Planning Capacity 

One of Minot’s most important yet understated achievements is the modernization of its  internal governance systems. Administering more than 176 million dollars in federal funds  required new staffing, advanced compliance systems, and updated planning  procedures6/9. Over time, the city developed sophisticated grant-management  frameworks, modernized procurement, and strengthened interdepartmental  coordination10

Planning capabilities expanded significantly. New staff positions in GIS, long-range  planning, zoning reform, and community engagement have enabled a more integrated,  systems-oriented approach to development and hazard mitigation17. Training in federal  regulations, resilience planning, and public engagement has made this capacity durable. 

This investment in people and systems may be one of Minot’s most enduring legacies: a  strengthened institution capable of delivering complex projects and shaping long-term  community outcomes. 

Lessons for Planners: Grants Are Not Just Funding—They Are Planning Tools 

CDBG-DR and CDBG-NDR enabled Minot to reshape entire neighborhoods, modernize  utilities, and build capacity in ways that traditional capital budgets could never match.  Planners should view major grant programs as instruments for implementing  comprehensive plans rather than one-off funding opportunities. 

Long-Term Recovery Requires Multi-Decade Vision 

The Souris River Flood Protection Project shows that post-disaster recovery extends far  beyond cleanup. True resilience requires generational commitment, phasing, and the  willingness to align land use, infrastructure, and financing over many years. 

Local Economic Diversity Is Critical 

Minot’s reliance on oil during the early boom years created vulnerability. Today’s  diversification supported by state funds and local incentives provides stability and buffers  the community against shocks in any single sector. 

Administrative Capacity Matters 

Minot dramatically expanded its planning and compliance capabilities, enabling it to  manage millions in federal funding and pursue new opportunities. Building staff expertise,  systems, and interdepartmental coordination is a core resilience investment. 

Downtown Revitalization Is Key to Identity 

Reinvestment in the city core helped restore community identity, attract private  investment, and create social cohesion after trauma. A strong downtown can serve as  both an economic engine and a symbolic center of recovery. 

Social Infrastructure Supports Physical Resilience 

Community foundation grants and nonprofit partnerships filled gaps that federal funding  could not address, ensuring social stability during long-term recovery. Investments in  human services, culture, and community spaces are essential complements to levees and  pipes. 

Climate Adaptation Must Be Mainstreamed 

Flood protections, elevation standards, and watershed-based planning illustrate that  resilience must be integrated into every policy and project. Climate adaptation is not a  separate program—it is a lens for all planning work.

5. Strengthening Community and Social Resilience 

Minot’s recovery also strengthened its social infrastructure. The Minot Area Community  Foundation awarded more than 600,000 dollars in 2025 to programs supporting food  security, mental health, youth services, and senior needs12. Local nonprofits expanded  services through grants and partnerships, maintaining critical support networks for families  still recovering years after the flood21/22.

Housing stability programs, run by the Minot Housing Authority and partner agencies,  provided case management, relocation support, and services that helped families avoid  displacement during reconstruction23. Investments in parks, trails, and the Minot Public  Library strengthened community connections and provided inclusive spaces for education,  recreation, and cultural programming15/24

Faith-based organizations also provided essential support through volunteer networks,  emergency funds, and community care programs 25. Together, these systems form a  durable foundation of human resilience that complements the city’s physical and economic  recovery. 

6. Preparing for a Changing Climate 

Minot now plans for a climate future marked by greater hydrologic variability. Updated  floodplain maps, elevated building standards, and zoning for open-space buffers reflect  this shift10. Critical infrastructure, such as lift stations, substations, treatment facilities, and  roadway crossings, have been elevated or redesigned based on projected conditions 16/17

Stormwater management has evolved through green-infrastructure strategies such as  detention basins, bioswales, and permeable surfaces24. Major projects now evaluate  future precipitation patterns, soil moisture trends, and resilience requirements at the  earliest design stages17. Emergency-management planning incorporates climate  scenarios and binational watershed coordination with Canadian partners2

This proactive approach ensures that Minot’s long-term resilience is not temporary but  designed to meet the uncertainties of future climate conditions. 

7. A Clear Vision for the Next 20 Years 

Minot’s long-range vision integrates flood protection, housing, economic diversification,  and climate adaptation into a unified strategy shaped by lessons of the 2011 disaster10.  Completing all SRFPP phases remains the highest priority, ensuring long-term protection  and adaptable infrastructure for future climate conditions17/18

Housing goals emphasize expanding both affordable and market-rate supply, focusing on  infill, mixed-income development, and new neighborhoods on safer terrain6. Downtown  revitalization will continue through mixed-use development, cultural investment, and  multimodal connectivity14

The city will modernize utilities, strengthen broadband, enhance transit and trails, and  invest in freight-supporting transportation infrastructure10. Workforce development  partnerships with Minot State University and regional industries will support new sectors  in manufacturing, logistics, ag-tech, and information services14/20

With expanded grant-administration capacity, Minot is poised to compete for major federal  programs in resilience, mobility, infrastructure, and economic development. These opportunities will shape a more adaptive, livable, and prosperous Minot for decades to  come. 

Conclusion 

More than ten years after the Souris River overwhelmed the city, Minot stands as a  stronger, safer, and more resilient community. Guided by long-term planning, coordinated  governance, and disciplined investment, the city used federal, state, and local funding to  modernize infrastructure, diversify its economy, strengthen social systems, and expand  internal capacity9/10

Minot now serves as a model for communities addressing climate change, economic  transition, and disaster recovery. Its experience demonstrates that resilience is built not  only through levees and floodwalls, but through planning, collaboration, and continuous  investment in people and place9/18. By applying these principles, Minot has transformed  its hardest lessons into a foundation for enduring strength and future growth. 


About the Author 

Steven Borjeson is a North Dakota native and a Senior Environmental Planner and Project  Manager with UltraSystems Environmental Incorporated in Irvine, CA. His work centers  on preparing environmental documentation under the California Environmental Quality Act  and the National Environmental Policy Act, coordinating technical studies, and managing  the review of complex development and infrastructure projects. His career began in the  City of Minot’s Planning Division and later continued with the City of San Diego’s  Development Services Department, where he gained practical experience in post disaster  recovery, zoning administration, and discretionary land use permitting. 

The recovery experience he gained in Minot has given him a practical understanding of community rebuilding that now guides his approach to disaster response in California. This  foundation guides his current consulting work with the County of Los Angeles, where he  supports coordination, documentation, and planning efforts for recovery operations  following the Eaton and Palisades fires, which caused extensive damage to homes, public  facilities, and essential infrastructure.

Works Cited

1 U.S. Geological Survey. (2012). Peak streamflow data for the Souris River at Minot, ND, 1904–2011. USGS

2 International Souris River Board. (2013). Summary of the 2011 Souris River flood. International Joint Commission.

3 North Dakota Department of Emergency Services. (2012). After-action report: 2011 Souris River flood. ND DES

4 Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2012). 2011 Minot, North Dakota flood: Impact and response summary. FEMA

5 City of Minot. (2013a). Minot 2011 flood recovery progress report. City of Minot.

6 City of Minot. (2016). CDBG National Disaster Resilience application. City of Minot. 

7 Ward County Historical Society. (2014). Voices of the flood: Oral histories from the 2011 Souris River disaster. Ward  County Historical Society. 8 North Dakota National Guard. (2012). 2011 Souris River Flood after-action review. North Dakota National Guard. 9 Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2013). Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery  (CDBG-DR) allocations: Minot, ND. HUD. 10 City of Minot. (2018). CDBG-DR action plan and amendments. City of Minot. 

11 North Dakota Department of Commerce. (2025). North Dakota Development Fund: 2025 project awards. North Dakota  Department of Commerce.

12 MACF (Minot Area Community Foundation). (2025). 2025 grant awards summary. MACF.

13 City of Minot. (2022). MAGIC Fund annual report. City of Minot.

14 Minot Area Chamber EDC. (2023). Downtown Minot revitalization overview. Minot Area Chamber EDC.

15 Minot Public Library. (2014). Flood recovery and reinvestment report. Minot Public Library.

16 Souris River Joint Board. (2019). Souris River Basin flood risk reduction plan. Souris River Joint Board.

17 City of Minot Engineering Department. (2020). Souris River Flood Protection Project: Phase 1–3 summary. City of Minot.

18 Souris River Joint Board. (2021). Project updates and climate adaptation design features report. Souris River Joint Board.

19 Port of North Dakota. (2022). Intermodal and logistics growth report. Port of North Dakota.

20 Minot State University. (2024). Workforce development and industry partnership report. Minot State University.

21 CAPND (Community Action Partnership of North Dakota). (2023). Annual community services report. CAPND.

22 Salvation Army – Minot. (2022). Feeding and emergency assistance report. Salvation Army.

23 Minot Housing Authority. (2021). Housing stability and support services report. Minot Housing Authority.

24 City of Minot Parks Department. (2023). Parks, trails, and recreation improvements report. City of Minot.

25 Ward County Ministerial Association. (2023). Faith-based community services overview. WCMA.


Paul Moberly